Preferred CUE Gap Markup

Locked
Nologic
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Preferred CUE Gap Markup

Post by Nologic »

I was just wondering whats the preferred method of markup for gaps in single or multi asset CUE files?

I'm toying around with scripts to create CUE's, Join files based on CUE's, Split files based on CUE's,...silly stuff anyways.


Preferred CUE Gap Markup


Vote options





PREGAP MM:SS:FF





POSTGAP MM:SS:FF





INDEX 00 MM:SS:FF





Other?
Last edited by Nologic on Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rocknroms
Posts: 858
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Preferred CUE Gap Markup

Post by Rocknroms »

Real cues normally have only INDEX (00 & 01 to store gaps)
My patch requests thread
--------------------------------
Nologic
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Preferred CUE Gap Markup

Post by Nologic »

Thanks for the reply Rocknroms.

Hehe I'm curious as to what the "Other?" method is that someone voted for...hehe guess I'm going to learn something new. Image
F1ReB4LL
Posts: 3395
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Preferred CUE Gap Markup

Post by F1ReB4LL »

PREGAP and POSTGAP aren't alternatives to each other, 00 index (before the track) is pregap, 02 to 99 (after the track itself) - postgap. Full dump -- cue with indexes, stripped dump (gaps were cut out) -- cue with PREGAP/POSTGAP commands (they tell the burning tool or emulator to insert some null samples there). This "vote" is pointless, hence closed.
Locked