Question about offset
Re: Question about offset
Once again: lsd, sbi, m3s contain stripped data from sub files. Some very old epsxe plugins could create them, psxt001z tool could also create m3s, maybe there are also standalone converters, no idea. If you're going to dump subchannels - dump them into .sub, there's no reason to use lsd/sbi/m3s at all, those are obsolete formats used to save some hdd space in the past.
Re: Question about offset
If I create a .sub with psxt001z, does that mean I don't need any other format?
If .sub is not listed in DB, is the result of using options such as / s not reflected?
Are / s etc. used for libcrypt and securom?
If .sub is not listed in DB, is the result of using options such as / s not reflected?
Are / s etc. used for libcrypt and securom?
Re: Question about offset
psxt001z doesn't create subs.blemm wrote:If I create a .sub with psxt001z, does that mean I don't need any other format?
If it is not listed, it doesn't have a libcrypt/securom protection.blemm wrote:If .sub is not listed in DB, is the result of using options such as / s not reflected?
Re: Question about offset
I was wrong,Convert rather than createF1ReB4LL wrote:psxt001z doesn't create subs.
Someday Will DB lsd be replaced by .sub?F1ReB4LL wrote:there's no reason to use lsd/sbi/m3s at all,
Re: Question about offset
Then I don't understand your question. "If I create a .sub with psxt001z, does that mean I don't need any other format?" - I've meant you'd better preserve all the subs, not only their lsd/sbi/m3s parts.blemm wrote:I was wrong,Convert rather than createF1ReB4LL wrote:psxt001z doesn't create subs.
Try to ask iR0b0t, he is the only one who has an access to the db...blemm wrote:Someday Will DB lsd be replaced by .sub?F1ReB4LL wrote:there's no reason to use lsd/sbi/m3s at all,
Re: Question about offset
OK, I will create another topic after a while and try it.F1ReB4LL wrote:Then I don't understand your question. "If I create a .sub with psxt001z, does that mean I don't need any other format?" - I've meant you'd better preserve all the subs, not only their lsd/sbi/m3s parts.blemm wrote:I was wrong,Convert rather than createF1ReB4LL wrote:psxt001z doesn't create subs.
OK
Try to ask iR0b0t, he is the only one who has an access to the db...blemm wrote:Someday Will DB lsd be replaced by .sub?F1ReB4LL wrote:there's no reason to use lsd/sbi/m3s at all,
There is no error correction code in subcode,
Is there any way to correct the area where libcrypt / securom is currently stored?
Is subdump.exe included in DICUI the same as the above subdump (experimental SubCode reading tool)?