Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post Reply
User avatar
ghost
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post by ghost »

They are not hard to do, just for considiration.

Renaming all ISOs in the dats as MDFs. They can be mounted and burned the same as ISOs and it is convinient for those who use MDS.

Use a fixed date on all "roms" in the dat, for consistency with differerent archive formats.

Thanks.
Jackal
Posts: 2598
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post by Jackal »

so we should switch to a proprietary and closed format.. and for what?  Image
User avatar
RiMMER
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post by RiMMER »

Jackal wrote:so we should switch to a proprietary and closed format.. and for what?  Image
That's a good point and I fully agree with that, but then again, by claiming this, you go against yourself.
The ECM thing you people use in the pakkiso thing is something similar. There is no way I can work with that in linux. But yes, I am the only one who uses linux, so you have no reason to care, I know Image
Jackal
Posts: 2598
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post by Jackal »

ECM and PakkIso are not Redump.org softwares.. they are third party tools used on 'other places'. In the end I still don't think this compression format is as practical as it should be. For personal archiving it's a tie for me between torrentzip (though that only works on smaller images) and no compression. Speed and practicality is more important to me than saving every last with slow compression.

btw. that new signature you have there might be offensive to some people  Image
User avatar
Rocknroms
Posts: 858
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post by Rocknroms »

My patch requests thread
--------------------------------
User avatar
RiMMER
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post by RiMMER »

Jackal wrote:btw. that new signature you have there might be offensive to some people  Image
like who for example? Image
jamjam
Posts: 281
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post by jamjam »

RiMMER wrote:
Jackal wrote:so we should switch to a proprietary and closed format.. and for what?  Image
That's a good point and I fully agree with that, but then again, by claiming this, you go against yourself.
The ECM thing you people use in the pakkiso thing is something similar. There is no way I can work with that in linux. But yes, I am the only one who uses linux, so you have no reason to care, I know Image
http://www.neillcorlett.com/ecm/
ECM comes with the source code on the main website, and has a GPL license. Does that solve your problem?
PS3Dec (decrypt ps3 images), PS3DumpCheck (check integrity), GetKey (dump PS3 metadata), DatSplit (split redump dats), GPack (compress related images together)
User avatar
ghost
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2026 1:26 am

Re: Suggestion: MDF and file dates

Post by ghost »

I see mds are needed and mdf are isos anyway. anyone can mount them whats the problem? At least consider the file date thing, because...
Rocknroms wrote:Anyone has already tested http://sourceforge.net/projects/t7z/files/?
... its slow as hell (compressing, decompressing and renaming), uses solid archiving by default and for images is worthless, it was designed for merged rom archiving which makes sense. and it completely removes the file date, call that a nitpicking but I hate that.
Post Reply