Page 9 of 15

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 1:11 pm
by iR0b0t
Na, i won't drop it. You never know.

Right now, i have no other suggestions.

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 5:17 am
by F1ReB4LL
Erm. I don't think you need to additionally set the pregap there. Just like the 1st track's pregap is always 150 sectors or more, the 1st track of the 2nd session pregap is expected to have 150 pregap sectors or more; if more - you add the INDEX 00 part with the extra sectors only, same for both the 1st and 2nd sessions.

If to use the "REM PREGAP 00:02:00" for the 2nd session, logically, we need to add it to all the single-session ones :-P

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 10:41 am
by Jackal
F1ReB4LL wrote:Erm. I don't think you need to additionally set the pregap there. Just like the 1st track's pregap is always 150 sectors or more, the 1st track of the 2nd session pregap is expected to have 150 pregap sectors or more; if more - you add the INDEX 00 part with the extra sectors only, same for both the 1st and 2nd sessions.

If to use the "REM PREGAP 00:02:00" for the 2nd session, logically, we need to add it to all the single-session ones :-P
You lost me there Image

I only see 2 solutions:

1. Completely define the area between the sessions in the cuesheet, so that tools can use the MSF lengths in the cuesheet to determine the amount of sectors to generate, without any assumptions or hardcoded values in software. This means that REM PREGAP should be included.

2. Assume that the area between the sessions is always the same and let tools use hardcoded values. So for the gap between the first 2 sessions, assume that LEAD-OUT is always 01:30:00 and LEAD-IN 01:00:00 and PREGAP 00:02:00. If we make these assumptions, then the REM LEAD-OUT and REM LEAD-IN lines are no longer needed and only the REM SESSION lines will suffice.

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 11:51 am
by F1ReB4LL
Jackal wrote:1. Completely define the area between the sessions in the cuesheet, so that tools can use the MSF lengths in the cuesheet to determine the amount of sectors to generate, without any assumptions or hardcoded values in software. This means that REM PREGAP should be included.

2. Assume that the area between the sessions is always the same and let tools use hardcoded values. So for the gap between the first 2 sessions, assume that LEAD-OUT is always 01:30:00 and LEAD-IN 01:00:00 and PREGAP 00:02:00. If we make these assumptions, then the REM LEAD-OUT and REM LEAD-IN lines are no longer needed and only the REM SESSION lines will suffice.
I think DIC cues (and maybe the redump "input" cues) should be like in p.1, but the "output" redump cues should be like in p.2 _until_ we meet anything that deviates.

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Wed May 29, 2019 3:00 pm
by Jackal
Sounds fine.. so what's the next step, getting sarami to define to add REM PREGAP in the DIC cuesheet, and getting iR0b0t to add support for REM SESSION lines in cuesheets? Image

And for the disc page, I guess there should be be separate boxes (with the Track / Cuesheet info) with total columns for each session? And also for the Dreamcast LD and HD area? Now Dreamcast is showing the total lengths and crc for LD and HD combined, but this is meaningless.

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:58 am
by sarami
added 'REM PREGAP' in test version.

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2019 10:23 pm
by user7
*Pokes this thread*

Are we at a standstill at getting Multisession discs added to redump, or are we waiting on DIC for an update?

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2019 12:14 am
by Jackal
See my last post. sarami did his part, so now we're waiting for iR0b0t..

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:32 am
by user7
*Pokes iRobot with a sharpened stick.*

Re: [DONE] Discussing the multisession cue

Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 4:02 pm
by iR0b0t
Can i see a cuesheet example of the latest DIC output for this, please.