Page 3 of 3
Re: Conv2multiBin
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:42 pm
by ssjkakaroto
Yes, it's going to be updated. I've already talked to Jackal.
The correct hash is from what I posted here.
Re: Conv2multiBin
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:52 pm
by sarami
Did you fix the dat of redump.org?
old
Code: Select all
<rom name="Interstate 76 CD2 (Track 02).bin" size="27346704" crc="e624d803" md5="e2ae8553f2ad7c4650c43c2253ae99c2" sha1="9ab1b0b407ea9fbce3d85e722e9c023d45a137e0" />
new
Code: Select all
<rom name="Interstate 76 CD2 (Track 02).bin" size="27346704" crc="2b42a466" md5="97bb40d39a710ea05656f4e2a5090ec9" sha1="00f652347819e5baf8ccb3f08cfa1bdd11f9d4b2" />
Re: Conv2multiBin
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:29 pm
by ssjkakaroto
Yes, you can see the dat here:
https://pastebin.com/a0sLbVeg
Re: Conv2multiBin
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:49 pm
by sarami
How about old version of this app?
Re: Conv2multiBin
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2018 11:11 pm
by ssjkakaroto
Same issues with the versions from 2012 and 2014.
Maybe the problem is actually with track 4, but Conv2multiBin is not outputting track 3 before it encounters the issue.
Take a look of this output from findcrcs:
Code: Select all
E:\findcrcs-0.3-bin-win64>findcrcs "Interstate '76 (World) (Disc 2) (Play CD).img" 29821008 43f89d66
388986906 43f89d66 57396ad442565debbf8844a2034c44c9
453115152 43f89d66 74028f15fe72f8d6127dbdaf3acc087c
The same CRC is found twice inside that file, but only once it has the correct MD5. Maybe Conv2multiBin doesn't know how to deal with this situation.
Re: Conv2multiBin
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 2:32 am
by sarami
Re: Conv2multiBin
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:18 am
by ssjkakaroto
Thanks sarami, the test version worked.
It did output the message:
Code: Select all
This image was ripped by a drive of 0 offsets
between tracks 3 and 4. Is that correct?
Here's the full output:
https://pastebin.com/ni7vpRSc
PS: The correct term at the end should be "Succeeded" not Successed
Re: Conv2multiBin
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:37 am
by sarami
ssjkakaroto wrote:between tracks 3 and 4. Is that correct?
It seems good.
ssjkakaroto wrote:PS: The correct term at the end should be "Succeeded" not Successed
Thanks
